People ex rel. King v. Gallagher and the Forgotten Legal Struggle over Racial Segregation in New York State Public Schools

David A. Weinstein

Volume 28.1 (download PDF)

Abstract

In 1883, in People ex rel. King v. Gallagher, the New York Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of a lawsuit brought on behalf of an eleven-year-old African American girl who sought admission into her neighborhood public school in Brooklyn and thereby challenged the legal segregation regime governing New York’s public education system. The case, largely forgotten today, had a profound impact on subsequent legal efforts at school desegregation. This article examines the development of African American legal rights to public education in New York State in the nineteenth century and early efforts to challenge the exclusion of Black students from public schools. It describes the King litigation and its place in the development of civil rights law, focusing on its role in entrenching the “separate but equal” doctrine.

Continue reading

No Remedy for Colonization

Sígrid Vendrell-Polanco

Volume 28.1 (download PDF)

Abstract

The United States purports to maintain a democratic relationship with its inhabited territories, yet the Supreme Court continues to uphold twentieth century laws that affirm rather than abrogate colonial policies. The gap between how the United States idealizes democracy and its real world application, especially in its five colonized territories (Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Islands, and American Samoa), is not just growing – it is becoming a chasm. These colonies are currently referred to as United States territories. In 2023, the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico experienced a controversial sovereignty challenge surrounding the Supreme Court’s ruling in Financial Oversight & Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc. In 2023, the Puerto Rican people expressed national outrage at the implementation and supervision of the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act (“PROMESA”) congressional statute due to its exclusion of Puerto Rican constituents from equal collaboration in debt crisis resolution and pronounced refusal of government transparency. This article contributes to the scholarly literature on United States territorial law by condemning the oppressive application of federal laws to the territories and contends that the Court has cut off any viable remedy for Puerto Rico to redress governance grievances. The Court continues to affirm colonial rule without a viable remedy for self-governance.

Continue reading

Mailing It In: Due Process Requires Technology-Driven Safeguards in Public Benefits

Eric Lukoff

Volume 28.1 (download PDF)

Abstract

Due process in safety net public benefit programs requires agencies to employ modern technology in providing notice that is reasonably likely to reach participants. The Supreme Court has held that due process is dependent on the time, place, and circumstances in which it operates. Scholars have further argued that due process is adaptable to changing facts and circumstances over time. Yet, mailed paper notices remain the standard in providing notice to participants in public benefit programs.

Continue reading

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act: Evaluating Its Promise and Navigating Regulatory Challenges in a Post-Chevron Era

Rebecca B. Stein

Volume 28.1 (download PDF)

Abstract

The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (“PWFA”) establishes the first federal standard to protect pregnant workers by explicitly granting them the right to reasonable workplace accommodations. Historically, pregnant workers have faced challenges in receiving the necessary accommodations due to limited legal protections, often forcing them to choose between income and health. Previous legislation, such as the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 and the Americans with Disabilities Act, provided insufficient protection.

Continue reading

The Imperceptibility of Muslim Identity

Nadia B. Ahmad

Volume 28.1 (download PDF)

Abstract

This article examines the challenges facing Muslim Americans, particularly Muslim women, as they confront systemic bias, intersectional oppression, and the racialization of religion in the United States. Through personal narrative and critical legal scholarship, it explores the pervasive nature of Islamophobia in political, academic, and societal spaces, highlighting its deep entrenchment in media and public policy. The author recounts a gendered Islamophobic attack during the 2024 Democratic National Committee’s Convention as an example of how prejudice and political intimidation intersect to marginalize Muslims. Using this experience as a foundation, the article critiques structural inequities reinforced through diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives that fail to disrupt entrenched systems of racism. It draws on emerging MusCrit scholarship, which situates Muslim identity within critical race theory, to advocate for counter-narratives that challenge reductive and racialized depictions of Islam.

Continue reading

CUNY Law Review’s Spring 2025 Symposium

Please see program posted below:

LR-Program

How To Be a Law Student While the World Is Burning

By: Lillian Perez

Last semester, one of our blog staff editors, Lillian Perez, set out to discover what CUNY Law students think about being law students in this day and age.

Continue reading

CUNY Law Review Symposium 2025

Register here

Equal Application Theory: A Revamped 1880’s Legal Theory Being Used To Attack Trans Rights

Jared M. Trujillo

In 2005 as a high school senior in Chicago, I found myself locked in a debate with my government teacher about gay marriage. He smugly declared “It’s not discrimination! Illinois’ marriage ban prohibits gay and straight people alike from marrying someone of the same sex.” I stared at him in disbelief with a dropped jaw and furrowed brow, as I thought I was doomed to fail the AP exam with the man who made that argument as my teacher. He mistook this look as defeat. Little did I know his “equal application theory” argument had a long pedigree stretching back to Pace v. Alabama in 1883, where the Supreme Court upheld an anti-miscegenation law because it equally punished Black and white participants. 

Continue reading

The New, New Colossus: An Annotated Version of ‘The New Colossus’ by Emma Lazarus

Nora Phillips and Salimah Khoja

Volume 28.1 (download PDF)

The purpose of this annotation is to raise awareness of the extreme restrictions in U.S. immigration law via a poetic outlet. It explores the juxtaposition of the promises of America with the reality under U.S. immigration laws. It delineates the various categories of “undesirables” that the United States aims to exclude and remove. Finally, it aims to begin to demystify U.S. immigration laws to show the extreme restrictions placed on immigrants.

Nora_Phillips_Salimah_Khoja_The_New_New_Colossus_28_CUNY_L._Rev._01_2024