$11 BILLION FOR WHAT?! INCARCERATED ORGANIZERS WITH NO NEW JAILS NYC EXPLAIN HOW TO SHUT DOWN RIKERS WITHOUT BUILDING NEW JAILS

Recommended Citation: Osha Oneeka Daya Brown, Lee Doane, Sterling Fleming, Hakim Trent, Jeremy Valerio, &and Outside Organizers with No New Jails NYC, $11 Billion for What?! Incarcerated Organizers with No New Jails NYC Explain How to Shut Down Rikers

Click here to view a pdf version of this article

Osha Oneeka Daya Brown, Lee Doane, Sterling Fleming, Hakim Trent, Jeremy Valerio, and Outside Organizers with No New Jails NYC

The House of the Interpreter

                 The Social Studies class didn’t teach me shits your Honor
                      We was shooting dice at third period
                 WE WAS in the bathrooms getting nice smoking
                      blunts at third period
                 My principal was a drug dealer
                      My teachers was drug feelers
                 My projects was an institution that prep me for
                      THE Metal fence institution
                 We went to jail to have family reunions
                 This is deeper then confusion
                 No computers, No cellphones
                      The history class didn’t teach me the truth about
                      myself I’m actually more valuable than what you
                 considered to be wealth
                 The system treated me like a gun used me and placed
                      back on the shelf the science class didn’t teach
                 me about health
                 I’m dominant
                      We need COOPERATIVE ECONOMICS to reach our
                      Accomplishments
                                                               – Hakim Trent-El

Continue reading

Volume 23.1

We are excited to publish Volume 23.1. See below for specific articles or explore the complete digital version here.

Articles

Cities in International Law: Reclaiming Rights as Global Custom by Andrew Bodiford, graduate of CUNY School of Law.

Notes & Comments

Generating Trauma: How the United States Violates the Human Rights of Incarcerated Mothers and Their Children by Christina Scotti, graduate of CUNY School of Law.

Education Is Liberation: The Power of Alternative Education Spaces by Matthew Amani Glover, CUNY School of Law Class of 2020.

More “Municipal” Than “Court”: Using the Eleventh Amendment to Hold Municipal Courts Liable for Their Modern-Day Debtors’ Prison Practices by Sonya Levitova, CUNY School of Law Class of 2020.

Public Interest Practitioner Section

Dismantling the Pillars of White Supremacy: Obstacles in Eliminating Disparities and Achieving Racial Justice by Kevin E. Jason, Assistant Counsel at the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

Civil Gideon and NYC’s Universal Access: Why Comprehensive Public Benefits Advocacy Is Essential to Preventing Evictions and Creating Stability by Jack Newton, Paula Arboleda, Michael Connors, and Vianca Figueroa, Legal Services NYC.

2020 Symposium: “Democracy At Your Fingertips: Your Voice, Your Vote, Make It Count”

On April 3, 2020, the CUNY Law Review (CUNYLR) will host its Spring Symposium at CUNY School of Law in Long Island City. The Symposium is an opportunity for an interdisciplinary gathering of legal scholars, practitioners, and community advocates to engage in dialogue on contemporary legal issues. 

At its conception, voting power in the United States of America was exclusively reserved for educated white men who owned property. A century of progress, where communities that were barred from suffrage saw gains in their access to the ballot box, continues to be threatened by concerted efforts to deny them their right to vote.

As such, this year CUNYLR will examine the interplay between voter rights, technology, and democracy, specifically on the issues of  gerrymandering, the 2020 Census, and the upcoming election. Our goal is to raise awareness about these issues and develop innovative solutions to address the disenfranchisement of marginalized communities. We will use the theme of accessibility to ground our discussion, focusing on how marginalized communities can continue to gain access to the ballot and ensure that their rights are not stripped by unjust laws and policies. This theme will evolve through the lens of three different panels:

2020 Census and Counting Communities of Color

The U.S. Constitution requires a Census every ten years.  The Census determines the number of congressional seats per district, and the data collected is then used to allocate federal funds for services that include Medicaid, SNAP, and Head Starts. Needless to say, ensuring that there is an accurate count is important, as an undercount can have dire consequences on communities of color. This panel will focus on the recent litigation surrounding the citizenship question on the 2020 Census, and other relevant laws and policies. Panelists will explore strategies and policies to ensure that every person is counted in the upcoming census regardless of their background. 

Voter Suppression & Language Access for the Ballot

Voting is the language of American democracy, yet there continues to be barriers to voting such as long lines at polling sites, voter ID requirements, broken voting machines, and even legislation aimed at keeping formerly incarcerated individuals from exercising their rights to vote. This panel will focus on raising these issues and discussing policies that will combat voter suppression in America, particularly in communities of color. Panelists are also encouraged to discuss the Ranked Choice Voting or Instant Run-Off Voting and how this will impact election results in the years to come.  

Tech & Democracy

Almost every aspect of our lives is shaped by digital technology and its immense efficiency. Yet in one vital area – the election of our political representatives – we still use pencil and paper, and for far too long, we have counted each ballot by hand. Following the controversial Bush v. Gore election, the voting process evolved. Now, voting does not simply rely on hand-counted paper ballots, but also on other innovative technologies such as electronic voting machines, punch-card voting machines, and more. Americans deserve to feel confident that our votes are accurately counted and protected. 

Our final panel is an opportunity to look at how emerging technology affects the integrity of elections and the efforts to ensure the fairness and accuracy of poll numbers. Panelists are encouraged to weigh the pros and cons of using technology in the voting process, and whether this has increased benefits and access for voters across various communities. 

For further information, please contact the Special Events Editor, Mirian Albert (mirian.albert@live.law.cuny.edu) or Community Engagement Editor, Christina Das (christina.das@live.law.cuny.edu). 

CUNY Law Review presents the Spring 2020 Symposium

The CUNY Law Review is proud to present our Spring 2020 Symposium, Democracy at Your Fingertips: Your Voice, Your Vote, Make It Count. The Symposium will take place on April 3, 2020.

Vol. 22.2

We are excited to publish Volume 22.2. See below for specific articles or explore the complete digital version here.

Articles

Stewarding the City as Commons: Parks Conservancies and Community Land Trusts by John Krinsky, Professor of Political Science at the City College of New York and the City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate Center, and Paula Z. Segal, Senior Staff Attorney in the Equitable Neighborhoods unit at TakeRoot Justice.

Notes

Still Separate, Still Unequal: Litigation as a Tool to Address New York City’s Segregated Public Schools by Andrea Alajbegović, Law Graduate at Legal Services NYC and CUNY School of Law Class of 2019.

Public Interest Practitioner Section

Limited Access Letters: How New York City Schools Illegally Ban “Unruly” Parents of Color and Parents of Students with Disabilities by Andrew Gerst, Staff Attorney/Sinsheimer Fellow, Mobilization for Justice, Warren J. Sinsheimer Children’s Rights Program.

Accidents Happen: Exposing Fallacies in Child Protection Abuse Cases and Reuniting Families Through Aggressive Litigation by Jessica Horan-Block, Supervising Attorney and Serious Abuse Case Coordinator at The Bronx Defenders Family Defense Practice, and Elizabeth Tuttle Newman, Staff Attorney at The Bronx Defenders Family Defense Practice.

THE OBSCURE LEGACY OF MASS INCARCERATION: PAROLE BOARD ABUSES OF PEOPLE SERVING PAROLE ELIGIBLE LIFE SENTENCES

Alejo Rodriguez

Click here for a recommended citation and to download a paginated PDF version of this article.

Introduction: An Odyssey and an Awakening

In 1985 I was convicted for a robbery related homicide. I wish I could say that it wasn’t me, that they picked the wrong person out of the line-up, or that I had nothing to do with the actual shooting, but I can’t. The minute I picked up a gun with the thought that a robbery would somehow rid me of my drug dependent lifestyle was the minute I became the coward who would end up taking someone’s life. I received an eighteen years to life sentence and before I knew it, I was in Attica Correctional Facility. I was a twenty-three-year-old unskilled high school graduate who had never been incarcerated. I didn’t know how I would make it to see the next day, let alone the next eighteen years. All I had was the present, “one day at a time.”

Prison is a world in and of itself. It is designed to break the human spirit. Yet, strangely, there was a familiarity about prison that I didn’t expect. Sure, the constant threat of cell bars, prison guards, and gun towers were all new and intimidating, but the sense that there was no way out and the constant threat of violence were, in many respects, no different than where I grew up in the Bronx. Many of us came from the same neighborhoods, same families, and formed the same gangs. Drugs were readily available, as was gambling, and prostitution. It would be years before I would hear the term “school-to-prison pipeline,” but once I did, I knew for certain that it was more than just a catch phrase—we were its by-product. Continue reading

Welcome (back)!

Hello from the 2019-2020 CUNY Law Review Editorial Board! If you’re reading this, you’ve found our website. We’re currently in the process of relaunching and repopulating this independently-run site with previous years’ content. In the future, you can expect to see Footnote Forum pieces, news about our upcoming events, and other timely updates.

Please don’t hesitate to reach out if you have any questions, and thank you for supporting scholarship for social justice.

THE PRESSURES OF PASSING, REINFORCED BY PRECEDENT

Lee Clark

Click here for a recommended citation and to download a paginated PDF version of this article.

As a trans person, one of the places that I have found safety is through the way I represent my gender expression. Clothing is at the pinnacle of my gender expression; it is something that I have had control over for a long time. To quote the famous social theorist Simone De Beauvoir, “One is not born, but rather becomes, a woman.”1 I might have been assigned female at birth, but I definitely did not express my gender in feminine ways, opting for clothes from the boys’ section of stores rather than the girls’ section. One way that people have been classified in society for centuries is through the lens of the gender binary as showcased through clothing, media, and culture. Clothing and fashion are where I recognized my personal autonomy at a young age, and how I could fight back against gender restrictions throughout my life.

A quote from Daniel Friedman, a suit designer from Brooklyn-based tailoring company Bindle & Keep, who works almost exclusively with trans and non-binary2 clients, resonated with me: “It’s all about feeling great in your body, especially when people have been struggling their entire lives and they finally get into something that really fits them . . . the way they’ve always envisioned something would fit them. That’s not fashion anymore and that’s what we’re after.”3 Obviously, clothing is fashion, as it pertains to garments and construction, but it extends further than that. Bindle & Keep is dedicated to dressing an identity and a body. Clothing and gender have a direct correlation as one of the ways to present one’s gender daily. Cis and trans people alike curate outfits and silhouettes that are used to present gender. But while the trans community is fighting for our fit in the courts, we are also fighting the gender binary that has never recognized our identity. Continue reading

VOL. 20.2

We are excited to publish Volume 20.2. See below for specific articles or explore the complete digital version here.

Public Interest Practitioner Section (PIPS)

Collaborating Across the Walls: A Community Approach to Parole Justice by Michelle Lewin, Co-Founder and Coordinator at the Parole Preparation Project, and Nora Carroll, Co-Founder of the Parole Preparation Project and staff attorney at The Legal Aid Society.

Reclaiming Restorative Justice: An Alternate Paradigm for Justice by Shailly Agnihotri, founder and Executive Director of the The Restorative Center, and Cassie Veach, recent graduate of CUNY School of Law.

Community Law Clinics in the Neoliberal City by John Whitlow, Assistant Professor of Law at University of New Mexico School of Law.

Articles

Paradoxes of Sovereignty and Citizenship by Hawa K. Allan, Fellow at the Center for the Study of Law and Culture at Columbia Law School.

Responses

9/11 and 11/9: The Law, Lives and Lies That Bind by Khaled A. Beydoun, Associate Professor of Law at University of Detroit Mercy School of Law.

In the Shadow of Gaslight: Reflections on Identity, Diversity, and the Distribution of Power in the Academy by Cyra Akila Choudhury, Professor of Law at Florida International University College of Law.

Hopeless Case?: Escaping the Proof Pitfall in Power-Dependent Paradigms by e. christi cunningham, Professor and Director of Education Rights Center at Howard University School of Law.

Normalizing Domination by Atiba R. Ellis, Professor of Law at West Virginia University.

On Race and Persuasion by Janine Young Kim, Professor of Law at Chapman University Fowler School of Law.

The Great American Dilemma: Law and the Intransigence of Racism by Erika Wilson, Assistant Professor of Law at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Law.

Notes

Police Brutality, the Law & Today’s Social Justice Movement: How the Lack of Police Accountability Has Fueled #Hashtag Activism by Corinthia A. Carter, recent graduate of CUNY School of Law.

Silent Struggle: Constitutional Violations Against the Hearing Impaired in New York State Prisons by Farina Mendelson, Law Clerk at Muldoon, Getz & Reston.

Local Responses to Today’s Housing Crisis: Permanently Affordable Housing Models by Julie Gilgoff, Legal Fellow at Sustainable Economies Law Center.

Climate Change, Environmental Justice and Urban Resilience event

This Friday, Oct. 6, we will be co-sponsoring a climate change conference at the school. Please join us as we listen to a host of incredible speakers on the issues of climate justice and community resilience. RSVP here: https://support.law.cuny.edu/climate-change.